> On Feb 13, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Peter, > > I agree that I wished I can rely on the fact that when a (enforced, > syntactical) limit is not documented, means there is no limit. > Apparently I can expect this from IBM.
The problem with this that when it stops working it could mean s sysplex outage (or more). I certainly wouldn’t bet my job on that. > > Not in every time this is clear and one might wonder how the absence should > be interpreted. > For this I like the MICF documentation that always states the range of the > value of a variable, even when: > "RANGE OF VALUE: PAGAPF ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum that is > limited only by practical bounds." > > Kees. ———snip ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
