I overlooked the virtues of single sign-on in TPX. Your shop has to code for 
it, but it allows a user to sign on to applications with various userids such 
as TSO and CICS. Caveat: the userid on every application must have the same 
password; TPX uses different userids according to application but passes along 
the original TPX password. A corollary of this design is that you can change 
your password on all applications by changing first the main TPX userid, then 
logging on to every application one by one. You do not have to enter the new 
password.

All this being said, I believe that this capability is an extra-charge feature 
over the base product.

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
[email protected]


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Longnecker, Dennis
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 6:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

I would agree with the below.    

The remote screen via capability is excellent for help desk.  No other software 
required, they just enter the persons RACF ID and they instantly see what is on 
the persons screen and as it changes.  Again, we don't have to have any 
software on the persons screen or have them do a single thing.

Also, TPX at least, produces wonderful SMF records.   So no matter what VTAM 
application they visit, I can produce reports on the total number of 
transactions they did, along with signon times for both the session manager and 
any VTAM applications.

Oh, and if you implement it, you can have single signon to your VTAM 
applications.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

We depend heavily on TPX here. A session manager provides two key benefits:

1) A session manager 'holds' a session from which the user gets disconnected. 
Nowadays TSO/E is pretty good at reconnection, but other VTAM applications do 
not have this capability. There is no substitute for this function for 
productivity. 

2) A session manager can support far more connections than any emulator I've 
ever seen. As a z/OS sysprog, I can limp along fairly well with just an 
emulator, but we have altogether several scores of CICS regions across the 
enterprise. TPX can orchestrate as many concurrent sessions as a user needs. 

A third benefit that I rarely make use of is the ability to 'move' a 
workstation from one location to another. I can walk to another desk even in 
another building and 'take over' my original TPX session. This can be 
especially useful for help desk/debugging activities. Fourth, Tom Brennan makes 
a usermod available to Vista that, together with an available usermod to TPX, 
causes the current session name to appear continuously at the bottom of the 
screen. The more sessions you have open--especially if they look very 
similar--the more important this feature becomes.

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Dana Mitchell
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 6:17 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

I think Tubes was acquired by IBM and became IBM Session Manager in the early 
2000's.  We converted several systems TPX, Cl/SuperSession etc to it at the 
time as part of the push to convert from ISV products to IBM products.

I haven't needed/worked with a session manager for many years with the easy 
availablity of just opening multiple Vista windows.  What sort of functions 
provided by a session manager do you require?

Dana

On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:28:13 -0500, Carmen Vitullo <[email protected]> wrote:

>I've used TPX, Teleview, not sure of Teleview is now TPX, both from CA, 
>Tubes from MACRO4 just to name just a few Carmen
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to