I would also like to know what the buffering spec was in both cases (per my previous comment).
Thanks, Martin Sent from my iPad > On 15 Feb 2017, at 23:18, Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm going to run it again tomorrow > > > Just to double check > > Thanks for your help > > > >> On Feb 15, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Sam Siegel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Are you sure it is not just cache? were the tests run multiple times >> and averaged? was the load on the system and dasd sub-system similar >> for each test? >> >>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Joseph Reichman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> And thank you all >>> >>> I just did a benchmark >>> >>> And I had a significant savings in CPU time >>> >>> 24 bit QSAM .85 CPU time 31 bit QSAM .34 CPU time >>> >>> I could tell it ran a lot faster >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Joe Reichman >>> 8045 Newell St Apt 403 >>> Silver Spring MD 20910 >>> Home (240) 863-3965 >>> Cell (917) 748 -9693 >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
