I would also like to know what the buffering spec was in both cases (per my
previous comment).

Thanks, Martin

Sent from my iPad

> On 15 Feb 2017, at 23:18, Joseph Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm going to run it again tomorrow
>
>
> Just to double check
>
> Thanks  for your help
>
>
>
>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Sam Siegel <s...@pscsi.net> wrote:
>>
>> Are you sure it is not just cache?  were the tests run multiple times
>> and averaged?  was the load on the system and dasd sub-system similar
>> for each test?
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Joseph Reichman
<reichman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> And thank you all
>>>
>>> I just did a benchmark
>>>
>>> And I had a significant savings in CPU time
>>>
>>> 24 bit QSAM .85 CPU time 31 bit QSAM .34 CPU time
>>>
>>> I could tell it ran a lot faster
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Joe Reichman
>>> 8045 Newell St Apt 403
>>> Silver Spring MD 20910
>>> Home (240) 863-3965
>>> Cell (917) 748 -9693
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to