Well, in my experience, at least part of the article is bunk.  Comments along 
the lines of the idea that legacy systems (written in Cobol or - horrors - 
assembler can't utilize modern technology like encryption?  Since when?  100% 
of our legacy data is encrypted.  None of it can be encrypted at the user 
workstation, regardless of how old the back end system is.  

Rex

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Mark Regan
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 4:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ComputerWorld Says: Cobol plays major role in U.S. government breaches

ComputerWorld is reporting "Cobol plays major role in U.S. government breaches"

http://www.computerworld.com/article/3181809/government-it/cobol-plays-major-role-in-us-government-breaches.html

Watch the wrap

Thanks,

Mark Regan

--
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to