Look for the "happy system" syndrome.

I.e. the system is meeting it's SLA targets, so WLM feels no need to start 
additional initiators. This will most likely require near real-time IEHIBALL 
activity.

Adjusting the Service Class Goals may help.
Also turn on SMF 99's and ask IBM for their opinion. 

In my experience with this phenomenon,  this has been due to the *exact* job 
mix running at that time. 

Something as trivial as starting an additional job is enough to stir the pot 
and everything becomes "right" very quickly.

Can't give you any direct advice, as the answer is "it depends".

HTH,

<snip>
We sometimes experience long delays in job initiation, which I cannot explain. 
It concerns a WLM managed jobclass, which is filled by Control-M. Every now and 
then, we see e.g. 4 jobs running and an accumulating number of jobs in the 
input queue, up to more than 100, waiting for one or more hours. When one job 
ends, the next job starts, but the number of executing jobs remains 4.

I have ruled out all obvious causes, such as a heavy loaded system, jobs not 
eligible to run on that system etc. etc.

>From the Redbook "System Programmer's Guide to: Workload Manager" I found that 
>JES2 is only following WLM, it will start a job when WLM has started an 
>Initiator ("If there are no free initiators, jobs run wherever another job 
>finishes, or WLM starts new initiators.").  The $DSRVCLASS,LONG displays the 
>number of initiators WLM has started for JES2 to use.

So the number of running job is fully determined by WLM and I am trying to find 
out why WLM does not start more initiators. The first period of the jobs has a 
Response Goal of 30 seconds. Since this includes a job's Input Queue time and 
jobs were waiting for several hours in the input queue, this only should have 
been a reason to start extra Initiators.

I have produced SMF record 99 subtype 6 and it displays a lot of information 
about the status of the Service Classes, like MPL-IN-TARGET and MPL-OUT-TARGET, 
but I have the feeling that this applies to swapping IN and OUT of already 
running tasks and does not say anything about jobs in the Input Queue.

My question is: which metrics can tell me more about WLM's decisions to start 
Initiators, not start them or stop them?
</snip>


::DISCLAIMER::
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.
E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information 
could be intercepted, corrupted,
lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in 
transmission. The e mail and its contents
(with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on 
the originator or HCL or its affiliates.
Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the 
author and may not necessarily reflect the
views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, 
dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written 
consent of authorized representative of
HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please 
delete it and notify the sender immediately.
Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and 
other defects.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to