In our documentation we say datasets or legacy MVS datasets; and files or zFS 
files.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of John McKown
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 8:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Terminology - Datasets

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Porowski, Kenneth <[email protected]>
wrote:

> From a z/OS - Mainframe perspective
>
> You have the UNIX filesystem with various  types of files in it.
>
> You have the "classic" Mainframe datasets (sequential, PDS, VSAM, 
> etc.)
>
> To differentiate the "classic" datasets from the UNIX filesystem/files 
> what is the correct/preferred terminology for the "classic" datasets?
>
> MVS dataset
> MVS style dataset
> MVS type dataset
> z/OS dataset
> etc.
> something else?
>

​OK, I go a bit weird (as expected). "Dataset" is a z/OS legacy term that 
applies to the entries in a VTOC and z/OS catalog. Note that I try (but fail on 
occasion) to _NOT_ call datasets "files". Because UNIX data containers are 
called "files".​ So, for me, I use the terms "legacy dataset" or "UNIX file" 
respectively for these data containers. And, just as a by-the-by, I consider a 
UNIX filesystem container to be a "legacy dataset" because it is basically an 
VSAM LDS and so is in the z/OS catalog and has an entry in the VTOC(s). Also, 
you can manage the filesystem container using things such as HSM, ADRDSSU/FDR, 
and so on. Said programs not being usable with individual UNIX files.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to