On 5/4/2017 9:55 AM, Phil Smith wrote:
(Note to the Brits: That's "NASA", not "Nasa"-yeah, yeah, house style. But
stupid.)
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39803425
So my question on this is, "If this old code ran anywhere near to acceptably when it
was written, how can it possibly not be fast enough on modern hardware?!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Phil,
I don't think the article was written by a Brit. They would have said
"NASA are" and "NASA develop".
TOm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
