On Fri, 5 May 2017 09:04:31 +1000, Andrew Rowley wrote: >On 4/05/2017 10:11 PM, Tom Marchant wrote: >> >> Did they say why it isn't supposed to work? >> Is there an undocumented restriction? >I am sure it *is* supposed to work, but it's easier to close a problem >as a user error.
I agree that it is supposed to work. That's why they fixed it once. I'll take your reply as, "No, they didn't give a reason for the claim that it isn't supposed to work." I would push back not allow it to be closed. Sometimes it can help to ask them to try to justify their statement. There is no documented restriction. >I am also fairly sure that no-one who would actually know whether it was >supposed to work has looked at the SR at this point. Yes. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
