[Default] On 21 May 2017 13:28:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [email protected] (Jesse 1 Robinson) wrote:
>RACF data base is not required to be PSU. PS with RECFM F is fine. RACF >predates VSAM. > Since VSAM came in with virtual storage, are you saying RACF was on OS360? Clark Morris >. >J.O.Skip Robinson >Southern California Edison Company >Electric Dragon Team Paddler >SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager >323-715-0595 Mobile >626-543-6132 Office ?=== NEW >[email protected] > > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin >Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 12:20 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: (External):Re: Sample JCL for file transfer using NJE/TCPIP > >On Sun, 21 May 2017 05:12:00 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: >> >>>RACF (I'm less sure) is VSAM. >> >>No, it is PSU (PS and Unmovable). Other attributes are mandated by IBM. >> >"Unmovable" would seem to imply uncopyable; the copy would have to go in a >different place. But there must be some provision for backing it up, and >little point in trying to move it to another system with such as FTP. > >Why not VSAM? Performance? Antiquity? It feels as if RACF has a built-in DB >engine. > >-- gil > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
