On Sun, 28 May 2017 11:31:41 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:

>Note:  Once you turn on the SMF collection, you will only get data from that 
>point in time forward.  So if you have something that connects only once a 
>month, you will not see it until at least 30 days has passed.
> 
Might one selectively block FTP with RACF, UACC=NONE,WARN and collect data?

>> What tools do you have for reviewing SMF data?
>> 
>> SAS/MXG
>> 
>> SAS/MICS
>> 
>> SAS
>> 
>> DFSORT
>> 
>> CA SMF Director
>> 
>> Other?
>> 
>> You might want to go to CBTTAPE.ORG and find the  utility DAF.  It does a
>> decent job in taking SMF data and showing you the fields in a more human
>> format
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: venkat kulkarni
>> > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 10:44 AM
>> > Thanks for reply. As you suggested,
>> >
>> > 1) I will add SMF 119 in SMFPRMxx
>> > 2) I will add SMFCONFIG statement in the TCP profile dataset  with
>> > TYPE119
>> >
>> > and then use dynamic command obeyfile and SET to make these new
>> > changes in affect.
>> >
>> > But can you please help me to follow next step to find the the FTP
>> > jobs which are still running in our system .
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Some SFTP implementations cut the same subtypes so make sure you
>> > > don't confuse yourself.
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of venkat kulkarni
>> > > Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 2:17 AM
>> > >
>> > > But before blocking port 23 for FTP, we want to make sure that all
>> > > jobs are running with SFTP.
>> > >
>> > > Is it possible to collect some SMF record, which can indicate the
>> > > current running jobs that are still using FTP.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to