Guys,

Where does this old Dino find readable examples in OO programming say in
c++?  I am trying to learn it.

Regards,

Scott
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:46 PM David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30/05/2017 9:52 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> > You're trying to scare the poor man!
> >
> > After I learned OO, I realized the problem in trying to communicate the
> concepts.
> >
> > - The easy-to-grasp explanations are stupid: Animal is a class. Dog and
> Cat are child classes of Animal. Fido is an instance of Dog. You could have
> an inherited public overridden method Speak() and say myAnimal.Speak() and
> if it were a Dog it would bark and if it were a Cat it would Meow ...
>
> Agreed. Inheritance should generally be avoided anyway. It has it's
> place but composition should be preferred 9 times out of 10. Inheritance
> is tightly coupled and can become incomprehensible once it gets a few
> layers deep.
>
> > - The real problems that are solved by the significant features are too
> hard to explain in a simple tutorial. I solved a problem the other day with
> a very sparsely-implemented virtual polymorphic method -- but it would take
> me an hour to explain what the problem was.
>
> Polymorphism is the key principle and you don't need an OO language to
> use it. Any language with function pointers can implement polymorphism.
> A case in point is the z/OS C stdio runtime which supports many
> different types of data source. fopen() is the factory function which
> populates the read/write (virtual) function pointers in the FILE
> structure. There's no reason why you can't write OO code in assembler. I
> see lots of assembler code with constitutional logic littered throughout
> which call different functions depending on some type which would
> benefit from an OO design.
>
> > Charles
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of David Crayford
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 5:23 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Question about C++
> >
> > This might bewilder you some more ...
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
-- 
Scott Ford
IDMWORKS
z/OS Development

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to