Paul Gilmartin wrote: >>Is this the right translation for Radoslaw? If so, he would be glad. >On Linux, not on z/OS.
Ok. Thanks. >>Or you can easily use REXX function TRANSLATE to do the same [1] , but if the >>input is large, then you may have some long overhead. >Does that work for MBCS? Hmmm, interesting question. I never used Multi Byte Character Set at all. That's a very interesting thing. I will also sniff around REXX-L about this. >>>BTW, why is the collating sequence for En_US just plain wrong? >>En_US is not wrong, but Radoslaw needs to use his country's code page. >In fact, my Linux setting was: >572 $ locale -a >C >C.UTF-8 >en_US.utf8 >POSIX >573 $ Yes, that is important. I will ask my Linux guru about this. Thanks for your kind posting. >... evidently vim understands polish characters even in the U.S.A. >But my complaint is that for LC_COLLATE=En_US, SORT on z/OS gives results very >simlar to LC_COLLATE=C, whereas LC_COLLATE=En_CA gives more reasonable >results. Problem does not occur on Linux. Ok, very interesting. Thanks for your very kind clarification. I believe this will help others too. Thanks Paul, I really value your reply! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
