On 7 June 2017 at 16:22, Itschak Mugzach <[email protected]> wrote: > Usually Rexx returns a value if called as a function. This is not the case > as systemrexx mostly called asynchronous (f axr,xxx) or from health > checker. A Rexx call is special in that it has output variables that are > mapped in your program, but the Rexx executes in a different address space.
Sure - I understand that. But where is the nature of the mapping of output *arguments* explained? What is the difference between an output argument and an output variable? I guess the easy thing is to not try to use output arguments; they are very un-Rexx-like, IMHO, whereas named variables that are accessible to an external routine are well understood. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
