Let's say company B has a history of being managed by smart technically
savvy people who developed their own software.  Let's also say company C
has a history of being a cash mill that just buys other companies, strips
the technical staff to the bone marrow, and milks the maintenance and
licensing revenue.  Perhaps B sees opportunities to consolidate some of the
many duplicate and redundant products of C (and with B's own), and use
their technical expertise to greatly expand their market with a relatively
modest increase in costs.

Just some hypothetical musings... any resemblance to any actual company is
purely coincidental.

sas

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:

> Both the ISV do have some similar products. In what way it is going to be
> an win-win situation
>
> On Jun 23, 2017 4:03 AM, "Clark Morris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > [Default] On 22 Jun 2017 09:05:37 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> > [email protected] (Tom Conley) wrote:
> >
> > >On 6/22/2017 11:30 AM, Phil Smith wrote:
> > >> John McKown wrote:
> > >>> https://www.channele2e.com/news/bmc-acquiring-ca-inc-going-private/
> > >>
> > >> If this goes through, I think we'll have to admit that antitrust is
> > dead. Remember that DOJ examined the CA-Sterling deal way back in 2000
> for
> > antitrust, but let it go through. 17 years later, there are many fewer
> > players...
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >
> > >With the current administration and DOJ, you-know-what through a goose,
> > >which is bad for all of us.
> >
> > Given the total size of the market I would say it is almost
> > inevitable.  The number of mainframe shops probably is continuing to
> > decline.  Millions of lines of COBOL code have been turfed in favor of
> > SAP and its competitors.  In recent decades, IBM has not been that
> > interested in the small mainframe shop even though these can grow into
> > being big mainframe shops.  The market for ISVs is shrinking.
> >
> > Clark Morris
> > >
> > >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
sas

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to