On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 07:54:35 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: > >However, if you still have tape, you can write the file from >EBCDIC to tape (where conversion will be done by I/O routines) in >ASCII. Once that is done, you can write to DASD with NO >Conversion, and then compress it and do the MD5 thing. > Why not just convert disk-to-disk? What does the tape intermediate gain? Performance? What code translation options are available nowadays? At all costs, avoid OPTCD=Q, which, I believe, still uses the dreadful IGC0010C translation.
>I'd suggest that you Zip the file before encryption. You won't >get very much in the way of compression once it is encrypted. > Was compression a requirement? I don't see it mentioned in the original ply. I urge doing as much processing on z/OS, then a simple binary transfer, originated at either end, to the "distributed" server. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
