Is it possible that it is ROSCOE (alternative to TSO) that your lonely last brain cell is trying to remember?
Ant. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J R Sent: Friday, 30 June 2017 7:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: JES2 Exit 16 (was Re: how to keep messages in the sys1.broadcast for ever) It really was a long time ago, but I think only one TSO user was swapped in at a time within each region. (There were TSEVENTs then, much like SYSEVENTs now). Caveat: I'm pretty much down to my last brain cell, so I could be misremembering. I spent 50 years in this business; the knowledge is still in my head but the table of contents and the index are both shot. YMMV! > On Jun 29, 2017, at 16:09, Paul Gilmartin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > What, then, was the scope of an allocation? Of an ENQ? What happened > if multiple users concurrently ALLOCATEd SYSUT2? I suppose carefully > avoiding RET=HAVE could keep the DSN spaces separate. And users would > just need to deal with that and the "IKJ56246I type_name NOT ALLOCATED, FILE > IN USE" > condition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
