Thanks for the pointer. But I suppose I should build at ARCH(5) which is the lowest common denominator to deal with any other customers who refuse to upgrade!
Robin -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples Sent: 16 July 2017 12:14 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LE strikes again Robin Atwood wrote: >I had sent the customer a version of the product compiled with XL/C at >ARCH(7) but that was not low enough! It looks like ARCH(5) is necessary. Not quite. On a z890 (or z990) machine ARCH(6) or lower is necessary. ARCH (5) or lower is necessary on z800 and z900 machines. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- Timothy Sipples IT Architect Executive, Industry Solutions, IBM z Systems, AP/GCG/MEA E-Mail: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
