On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:33:55 -0700, Gerhard Adam wrote: >Since the amount of storage was nearly 50 times greater than the original, it >seems that the program is clearly managing [or searching] are large amount of >storage that it doesn't need. It seems that that might account for the CPU >time increase. > >I see no reason why a program that successfully ran using the default region, >should suddenly allocate all the available memory just because 0M was coded. > >Even though you said the increase in storage was not surprising, it actually >is.
I agree. Increasing the region doesn't ordinarily increase the storage utilization. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
