Great minds must think alike!!!!
After seeing this recently in a thread here, I decided to download B2H
and try it.
I initially received the exact same error you have listed below. To get
past this issue, I changed the default MVS Dataset Allocations (search on
MVSAlloc) to use an LRECL of 2048. At approximately line 467, I have the
following:
MVSalloc. ='DSORG(PS) LRECL(2048) RECFM(V) TRACKS
SPACE(5,5) RELEASE'
This change did get me past the B2H317 error and I did ultimately
produce an html file. However, some of the boxes did NOT format
correctly........
I am still tinkering with it............
Good Luck
Hth
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 7:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Friday Fun: hcd charts to htm via b2h issue
Has anyone successfully used b2h for an iodf chart on z/OS?
I've uploaded b2h and created both lcu and switch charts and when I run them I
get these errors on z/OS
|B2H455 WARNING: :xmp scale='.6 ' :ih1.control unit, by # :i2.1000
|B2H455 WARNING: (in line 1789 of T311LBD.IODF1.REPORT)
|B2H317 ERROR: RC=1 output record truncated while writing to DD=B2H00007
DSN='T311LBD.B0029556.$TMP0391' Record=' &nbs
p; | | &
nbsp; | | &nbs
p; | | &
nbsp; | | &nbs
p; | | &
nbsp; | | &nbs
p; | | &
nbsp; | |'
|B2H107 Info: Highest RC=8
When I run it under oorexx under windows the lcu chart looks great but the
switch charts has these anomalies:
0 1 2 0 1 3
&bx0220.&bx0202.00&bx0202.&bx0202.02&bx0202.&bx0202.04&bx0202.&bx0202.06&bx0202.&bx0202.07&bx0202.&bx0202.08&bx0202.&bx0202.09&bx0202.&bx0202.0A&bx0202.&bx0202.0B&bx0202.&bx0202.0C&bx0202.&bx0202.0D&bx0202.&bx0202.0E&bx0202.&bx0202.0F&bx0202.&bx0202.10&bx0202.&bx0202.12&bx0202.&bx0202.14&bx0202.&bx0202.16&bx0202.&bx0202.17&bx0202.&bx0202.18&bx0202.&bx0202.19&bx0202.&bx0202.1A&bx0202.&bx0202.1B&bx0202.&bx0202.1C&bx0202.&bx0202.1D&bx0202.&bx0202.1E&bx0202.&bx0202.1F&bx0202.&bx0202.20&bx0202.&bx0202.21&bx0202.&bx0202.22&bx0202.&bx0202.23&bx0202.&bx0202.24&bx0202.&bx0202.25&bx0202.&bx0202.26&bx0202.&bx0202.27&bx0202.&bx0202.28&bx0202.&bx0202.29&bx0202.&bx0202.2A&bx0202.&bx0202.2B&bx0202.&bx0202.2C&bx0202.&bx0202.2D&bx0202.&bx0202.2E&bx0202.&bx0202.2F&bx0202.&bx0202.30&bx0202.&bx0202.31&bx0202.&bx0202.32&bx0202.&bx0202.33&bx0202.&bx0202.34&bx0202.&bx0202.&bx0202.&bx0202.&bx0202.&bx0202.&bx0202.&bx0202.
&bx2020.
&bx2020.
Any advice/suggestions?
I can't see spending the $$$$ that IBM is asking for DCF as this is the only
reason we would use it.
Thanks in advance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lionel B. Dyck
Mainframe Systems Programmer - TRA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
