I don't want to turn this into a HealthChecker thread, but I believe the hammer is as big as you make it. When a check trips it generates a console/syslog message. I assume most sites have some sort of method to escalate key messages. Same framework can be used for the Healthchecker messages you deem worthy. It doesn't rely on the user recognizing the message at command time and keeps on nagging to assure you don't forget about it.
Bart -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Carmen Vitullo Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 1:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: APAR'd Re: What casues IPL/XCF to read the CFRM data set for the policy ? I run the health checker in my test LPAR, last 2 companies I worked with....don't want it didn't like it...don't run it. I like the idea and have used the checks. but that's not a big enough hammer for most sites. my 2 cents Carmen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bart van der Grijn (B)" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 12:30:28 PM Subject: Re: APAR'd Re: What casues IPL/XCF to read the CFRM data set for the policy ? Why not a Healthcheck that would report on a pending policy? Bart -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of J Ellis Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 12:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: APAR'd Re: What casues IPL/XCF to read the CFRM data set for the policy ? Agree with all your comments. I have asked for an operator command that shows exactly what/why there is a pending condition. And especially a message at IPL time that something is wrong or there are inconsistencies -- what do you want to do now ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
