some years ago I Had to call a openssl library from Pl/1. the Openssl library was compiled using XPlink (31 Bit). it worked in the End. the only Problem was that there Had to be a Interface Module doing a dynamic fetch on the XPlink object, because static linkage was Not possible. And Posix (on) was needed. But No Problems with Switching enclaves etc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gesendet mit der Telekom Mail App <http://www.t-online.de/service/redir/email_app_android_sendmail_footer.htm> --- Original-Nachricht --- Von: John McKown Betreff: Re: Can AMODE 31 C/C++ get a signal on a S0C1/4 in AMODE 64 assembler? Datum: 29.08.2017, 17:34 Uhr An: [email protected] On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Don Poitras <[email protected]> <http://sas.com>> ; wrote: > But you _can_ address data above the bar in "pure" C. Just compile and link > the C code as 64-bit. > I've no experience, but from what I've read, this is "CPU costly" in that the 31 bit C is running in a "normal" (non-XPLINK) LE enclave whereas 64 bit C _must_ run in an XPLINK LE enclave. Starting and stopping the XPLINK LE enclave is "expensive", again from what I've read. Of course, with some hard work, I think it might be possible to use a CEEPIPI to create and maintain an XPLINK 64 bit LE enclave and dynamically swap between the LE enclaves. -- Caution! The OP is an hyperpolysyllabicsesquipedalianist and this email may cause stress to those with hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] <http://listserv.ua.edu> with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
