On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 22:42:47 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
>
>What if job #1 now allocates +2?
>
What does a relative generation number greater than +1 mean? Must
be something because the JCL Ref. says:
v The numeric portion (not + or -) of a relative generation number must be
expressed
in 1 to 3 numeric characters. For example, +100, -002, +4, -09, 000.
Does allocating MANAGED.TEST.GDG(+100) leave a gap of 99 values in the
numbering? Or does it fill in the 99 not mentioned generations with new data
sets?
>+1 remains that thru the job.
>
>On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:54:04 -0500 Kirk Wolf wrote:
>:>
>:>BPXWDYN RC= 34603008 (0x2100000)
>:>IKJ56225I DATA SET MANAGED.TEST.GDG ALREADY IN USE, TRY LATER+
>:>IKJ56225I DATA SET IS ALLOCATED TO ANOTHER JOB OR USER
>:>IEFA110I DATA SET CONTENTION
>:>
I agree with Kirk's surmise that the ENQ conflict is on the base, not on
the generation, so +2 is probably not a circumvention.
What does a Display GRS from the console or from DDLIST show?
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
