> On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:13 AM, Peter Hunkeler <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> Long time ago and when MVS first came out, we used to do this quite often 
>> (once a week). A product we had called DUO (DOS under MVS). DUO maintained a 
>> table in the nucleus for which dos jobs were running. They had a bug in 
>> their code that would not delete entries. We had to go in and blank out the 
>> job names that were not running(so as not to have to IPL). We finally got 
>> tired of doing this and wrote a program that did it. 
> Worked like a charm. They asked for the program and we were not in a good 
> mood so we said no. It took them a year to figure out how to do it.My memory 
> is hazy here but I think the degression was  
> “duo” -> went to some company in Dallas? and then a year or two later CA 
> bought them out. By then we had gotten rid of all the jobs. One of the long 
> time contributors to IBM-Main used to work for the company if he hasn’t 
> retired maybe he could speak up?
> 
> 
> Ed, not sure how your comment relates to the topic at hand. You can always 
> write a program to modify just about any bit in storage, but that has nothing 
> to do with native support by the operating system. 
Peter,

The person was asking about reloading the nuc (IIRC). I just added in a bit 
where it was possible at one time to alter it. 

Ed

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to