> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T1010789
I don't know who wrote that document, but it wasn't me, and does not represent anything that anyone sane would think is suitable for production use. The basic problem is the use of LNKLST UPDATE JOB=* which is unpredictably dangerous and can vary from "working" to abends to crashing your system (with little to no sympathy for those that suffer the latter symptom). It is basically a "I have nothing to lose because I'd have to re-IPL anyway if this didn't happen to work" option. >would it be possible to activate LNKLST1 again instead of defining LNKLST3 ? Going beyond "possible", activating LNKLST1 would be the recommended approach. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
