I would contact CA for assistance. You will get answers, but will they be right for your situation would need to be determined by you.
An old manager of mine use to say: We pay a lot of money to the vendor for their product. Use their support team. Otherwise why have the product if we do not need their support. Lizette From: venkat kulkarni [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 4:17 AM To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>; Lizette Koehler <[email protected]> Subject: Re: CA View SAR migration Thanks for reply. No, I have not contacted CA yet. I wanted to do my self. So, i tried reading CA View reference guide and with different utility. I made some progress but not fully. If any body can throw some light on this will be great help. I used SARPAC utility to find report about SYSOUT reports and SARTSLIST etc to find individual report on each database. I referred <https://communities.ca.com/thread/241736589> https://communities.ca.com/thread/241736589 for this purpose. My query is, using below JCL how are we going to migrate SAR database from old tape drive to new VTL Where and how do we specify that my report should copy from old tape drive to new VTL and now SAR should use new VTL library for archive purpose. /SARPAC EXEC PGM=SARPAC,PARM='SARD.OPR,' //* STEPLIB DD DSN=CAI.CVDELOAD,DISP=SHR //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* * //SARDRLST DD SYSOUT=* * //SYSOUT DD SYSOUT=* //SORTLIB DD DSN=SYS1.SORTLIB,DISP=SHR //SORTWK01 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(CYL,(10),,CONTIG) //SORTWK02 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(CYL,(10),,CONTIG) //SORTWK03 DD UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(CYL,(10),,CONTIG) //SYSIN DD * /* I remember, there is UNITSPEC parameter where we can put ESOTERIC for current tape drive but i dont find any single document giving clear picture on this migration. Kindly suggest. On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Lizette Koehler <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Have you contacted CA SAR Support for assistance? They maybe better able to assist you Lizette > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> ] On > Behalf Of venkat kulkarni > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 9:04 AM > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: CA View SAR migration > > Hello, > > We have requirement of migrating SAR from told tape drive to new tape less > drives. So, when we look at SAR related dataset, which are on tape > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000092 TARQ51 > > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000098 TARQ51 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000102 TARQ51 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000093 TARQ52 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000094 TARQ53 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000099 TARQ53 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000104 TARQ53 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000109 TARQ53 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000095 TARQ54 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000105 TARQ54 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000090 TARQ55 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000096 TARQ55 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000097 TARQ56 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000101 TARQ56 > > > > > if you look at above datasets, we are using 6 tapes for SAR backup currently > and > > when we list content of tape Ex TARQ51, we see only > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000102 TARQ51 > > > > dataset which has highest number of time stamp and in my case it was 102 for > TARQ51 volume and below dataset not found on tape. > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000092 TARQ51 > > SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000098 TARQ51 > > And this is same of other volumes also, like for TARQ53, i couldn't find > only SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000109 dataset etc. > So, we planned to migrate these available dataset from old tape to new tape > less disk sub system using below JCL and dataset gets copied. > > //OP117SAQ JOB (660),SAURABH,CLASS=A,MSGLEVEL=(1,1),NOTIFY=&SYSUID > > //STEP1 EXEC PGM=SARTCP,PARM='COPYASIS' > > //*TEPLIB DD DSN=CAI.CVDELOAD,DISP=SHR > > //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* > > //TAPEIN DD DSN=SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000093, > > // DISP=OLD,UNIT=359D,LABEL=(1,BLP),VOL=SER=XARQ52 > > //TAPEOUT DD DSN=SAR.TARQLTY.SARTAPE.T0000093, > > // DISP=(NEW,KEEP),UNIT=359D,LABEL=EXPDT=99000,VOL=SER=TARQ52 > > //SYSIN DD DUMMY > > > > Then, we updated SAR parmlib member to use new Esoteric for tape less device > and run update Job. > > > > But when we run SAR again, it was not able to use new tape less device while > archiving reports. > > > > Please correct me, if we are following right way of migration. > > > > Thanks & Regards > > Venkat > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
