[Default] On 16 Jan 2018 06:54:52 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [email protected] (Ron hawkins) wrote:
>Tim, > >Things changed a couple of decades ago. > >VSAM physical block is not always the same as the CISZ. > >32K CISZ does not waste any space on the track. Where is this written up? Being retired, I missed this and didn't realize this was true on the OS390 system I worked on in the 1990s. Clark Morris > >Ron > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
