On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:50:46 -0600, Tom Marchant wrote:

>On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 23:27:35 +0000, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>>I thought that if PTF A was superseded by B, and B superseded 
>>by C, then SMPE would only install only C and mark A and B as 
>>SUP'D. That logic, if it obtains, always made sense to me. 
>That is correct. And there is no need to apply A or B if you plan 
>to apply C. But there should be no harm in specifying all three in 
>the apply. If it doesn't work, at least one of the PTFs must be 
>incorrectly constructed.
Does the check for whether a SUPerseding PTF correctly replaces all
elements operate if the putatively SUPerseded PTF is merely RECEIVED,
not necessarily APPLYed?


For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to