Tom, >The way I read this is that the PARMLIB member does not agree with the >ICHRDSNT already in use by the RACF sharing group. Are you absolutely >sure that the PARMLIB member is correct and agrees with your current >ICHRDSNT in every respect? If so, then I would open a PMR for this issue.
thanks for giving me a different interpretation of the message. There was an unintended difference in the statistics section. We have reIPL'd, and the message is gone. So no sysplex wide IPL necessary! :-) Barbara ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
