I guess I could have this wrong, but I have never been one to believe that 
fixing problems by consensus is a good idea.  It is more than a little 
possible, and I'm sure we have all seen it on this list before, that a majority 
could "think" that some solution is "correct" when the actual correct solution 
is later offered by a lone individual or a minority of people.  

Just because the majority of a group thinks that something is correct doesn't 
necessarily mean that it's the right answer.

That also leaves nothing for the "more ways to skin a cat" type of solution 
where there may be several ways to successfully resolve a problem, some ways 
being easier for a certain site and harder for others.  How many times on this 
list was the solution provided and then someone came along and outlined a 
"better" way to implement that solution?  Too many to count I would imagine.

Like management by committee, there are some things that can be accomplished 
that way, but there are many types of things that just plain can't be addressed 
that way.  I believe that mainframes and systems programming in particular fall 
into the category of "one size does not really fit all", so assuming that the 
solution with the highest number of votes is the correct one could be less help 
than the current way IBM-MAIN functions.

Brian

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to