On 2018-06-07 11:05, John McKown wrote:
I thought that mm/dd/yyyy.jjj (US) or dd/mm/yyyy.jjj (non US) would be "better"
For anyone that needs to look at US and non-US syslog output, this would lead to unhappiness. Especially here in Canada where there is little consistency in the use of dd/mm/yyyy or mm/dd/yyyy.
BTW, are we having this conversation on June 7 or July 6? ;) -- Regards, Gord Tomlin Action Software International (a division of Mazda Computer Corporation) Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507 Support: https://actionsoftware.com/support/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
