On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 11:22:51 -0700, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
>Well, it's not a "problem" (FSVO "problem") but in an example that is >supposed to show the fast way of doing things, one might avoid slower >instructions, such as storage literal references, when alternatives like >TMLH and LLILF are now available. Even with the older instructions it will be faster than doing a real POST :) (And if an application's performance characteristics are such that the difference in a few instructions in a fast-POST implementation are going to matter, should it really be using WAIT/POST, or something else altogether?) -- Walt ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
