Oh my gosh, you would have to maintain JCL forever for that and a dozen other reasons.
BUT! Conceivably ... conceivably ... you might stabilize it and do everything new in Rexx going forward. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Melcher, Jr Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 10:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: REXX as JCL replacement Once upon a time a LONG time ago this was a GUIDE requirement. It was voted down due to the amount of automated systems that generated JCL. You'd have to keep JCL, probably forever, because of those systems. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
