I have not used it for that specifically, but I don't see why not. The policy based rules allow for job/task names and support wildcards, and you might not even need those if you can filter based on a unique port range. I've been impressed with AT-TLS, as it offers a lot of customization options, as well as quite a few OOB use cases. An underrated feature of comm server IMO.
HTH, Mike -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Rob Schramm Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2018 12:45 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: AT-TLS for HTTP This might be a weird one. I have used Policy Agent AT-TLS in the past to secure JDBC communication with a UDB data base. Can I use Policy agent to secure an existing HTTP GET process (assembler program), by doing a similar process? Has anyone else done this? Thanks, Rob Schramm -- Rob Schramm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
