Program did not need APF. Shared production library contained other programs that did need it. Until my bad JCL, it had never been a problem. I guess times were simpler then...
. . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2018 7:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: (External):Re: Linklist and APF Putting on my security preacher hat, I might argue that programs that do not need APF (i.e., test successfully without it) should not be in an APF library. Granted, your story is from simpler times (I would assume). Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2018 6:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Linklist and APF My very first oh-dark-thirty support call as a sysprog was for a program I had just updated. I had cluelessly assembled it using JCL that had RENT,REFR in the link edit step. After testing, I moved it from the non-APF test library to the APF production library. Big S0C4. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
