<snip>
The syntactic difference and the citation of I&T Ref. lead me to suspect
that the substringer is part of the system symbol resolver, at execution
time, not of the Reader/Converter.  But the interpreter must make the
decision, based on the second character following the symbol name.
</snip>

Basically, "yes". The rule for the system symbol resolver is that a symbol 
followed by a substring expression is treated as asking to use a substring 
of the symbol.
A symbol followed by something that does not meed the exact requirements 
of a substring expression is treated as asking to use the symbol and then 
use whatever characters follow. A substring expression, in this sense, 
does not allow for "+", so &SYM(+0) is not &SYM with a substring 
expression.

Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to