How about Master and User catalogs?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:56 AM Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> My guess is that the security bypass was for opening paging and swap data 
> sets and maybe STGINDEX.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
> Walt Farrell <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 11:14 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Security bypass on key 0 / sup state VSAM OPEN was Re: A 
> curiosity Question
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 12:00:51 -0300, Clark Morris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >[Default] On 27 Jul 2018 17:41:11 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> >[email protected] (Rob Schramm) wrote:
> >
> >>I am not sure.. They out those extended checks with smf 82's.. and put some
> >>use parameters in the asymuse.
> >>
> >>I don't like bypassing security calls.. it's just a slippery slope to
> >>bypassing all of it.
> >
> >Why should OPEN security checking be bypassed for VSAM and no other
> >access method in key 0 / supervisor state.
>
> As far as I know only the VSAM designers who made that decision decades ago 
> would know. My guess: some system component that could not tolerate the check 
> (at that time probably for passwords, via an operator prompt) could not 
> tolerate the interruption, so they decided to bypass the security check. 
> Also, there is (or was) very little usage of OPEN for VSAM files by 
> supervisor state or key 0 programs.
>
> I found out about it many years ago while working on a customer problem 
> report while I was in RACF Development. At that time it was undocumented. I 
> recall that the VSAM team determined that behavior to be so old and ingrained 
> to the processing that it could not be changed safely, for compatibility 
> reasons if I remember correctly. But I did convince them it needed to be 
> documented.
>
> --
> Walt
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to