I dunno. I *think* the alternatives and digraphs like not and <% are adequate for any code page. I could easily be wrong. They behave better in my impression because I think the compiler parses them just like any other operator or token, whereas the trigraphs behave like "uber-macros" and get substituted even in string literals and comments.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 12:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: EBCDIC (was: Json table characters) On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 11:08:36 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >Yes, ??= is the trigraph for #. Talk about hash! > >Trigraphs go away in C++17. > Then what happens? ISO Latin only? ??=pragma codepage ...? Other (specify)? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
