No. GIMUNZIP requires specially built SYSIN. Something like this: //SYSIN DD * <GIMUNZIP> <ARCHDEF name="S0002.CSP.STP25884.DOCLIB.pax.Z" volume="*" newname="S04.STP25884.DOCLIB"> </ARCHDEF> <ARCHDEF name="S0003.CSP.STP25884.RIMLIB.pax.Z" volume="*" newname="S04.STP25884.RIMLIB"> </ARCHDEF> <ARCHDEF name="S0005.CSP.STP25884.PGMDIR.pax.Z" volume="*" newname="S04.STP25884.PGMDIR"> </ARCHDEF> </GIMUNZIP> OTH, it could be a paxed ESD to be unpaxed by the 'pax -rvf' command run under BPXBATCH. If this guess is right, you should see after unpaxing a job UNZIPJCL or alike that will do GIMUNZIP.
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:37:32 -0500, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: >On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:12:54 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote: > >>GIMUNZIP? >> >No. > >o It's unlikely that a a USERMOD would be delivered in GIMZIP format. > >o GIMUNZIP is roundabout, more steps. RECEIVE FROMNTS is at least > effective, and simpler. > >Could the victim post here the first few lines of the USERMOD as it >appears on the desktop and as it appears on z/OS, and details of the >process, commands and options. > >-- gil > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
