I can't find, but it the last few weeks the Tech pubs were reporting that M$ 
had upgraded it's Cloud servicesecurity to compete with AWS for DOD contracts.  
Remains to be seen.
I am skeptical availability will improve until the people allowing 24 hr 
outages are replaced.




-----Original Message-----
From: Allan Staller <[email protected]>
To: IBM-MAIN <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, Sep 28, 2018 8:42 am
Subject: Re: Why Salesforce for SR?

<snip>
" Short answer is I don't worry about having cases in Salesforce. If done 
properly availability and customer experience should improve with no concerns 
about data security."
</snip>

Remains to be seen.
I am skeptical availability will improve until the people allowing 24 hr 
outages are replaced.

IMO, in this day/age there is almost no excuse for this kind of outage in this 
day and age.
All platforms WIN*, *ix, ....  support some sort of high availability models.

Refrain: "the new tools are neither as reliable, functional or available as 
those being replaced.





-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Knutson, Samuel
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 8:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Why Salesforce for SR?

There are good reasons to advocate that IBM properly consider all the use cases 
and needs of the mainframe community but I'm not concerned about confidential 
data.  Salesforce is already used for case management by many of the largest 
companies in the world.  [Full disclosure including Compuware]
IBM is hardly blazing a new path using Salesforce for case management.    
Salesforce documents their thoughts on security here and in other places 
https://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.salesforce.com%2Fhub%2Ftechnology%2Fcloud-security-is-salesforce-priority%2F&data=02%7C01%7Callan.staller%40HCL.COM%7C33021a999de04040500308d624e0a76c%7C189de737c93a4f5a8b686f4ca9941912%7C0%7C0%7C636736944660556032&sdata=lqxKwMJSaY5etiWJygRZo9KzWAZCKGuZpf3x0fW%2Bo24%3D&reserved=0
   Two platform IT 
https://apac01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DGMc29ckVRdA&data=02%7C01%7Callan.staller%40HCL.COM%7C33021a999de04040500308d624e0a76c%7C189de737c93a4f5a8b686f4ca9941912%7C0%7C0%7C636736944660556032&sdata=T5xGJcRrJ3hEfJgQmDt7c7eUU7X4ZbNrF3t5%2FVG6Gik%3D&reserved=0
 is something my company has advocated for as a sound strategy and where 
something is truly a commodity like case management today leveraging cloud 
consumed services is a wise choice.  For applications that run on IBMz they are 
by now almost exclusively customer developed applications for which no equal 
exists and provide a unique competitive advantage those should rightfully 
continue to run on the most efficient hyper converged system you can use the 
IBM mainframe platform.

Short answer is I don't worry about having cases in Salesforce. If done 
properly availability and customer experience should improve with no concerns 
about data security.


Best Regards,

Sam Knutson  |  VP, Product Management  |  Compuware @samknutson |  
linkedin.com/in/samknutson [email protected]  |  M: +1 301 996-1318



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Clark Morris
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Why Salesforce for SR?

Since Salesforce isn't owned by IBM why is what could be something requiring 
potential decent degree of confidentiality such as Service Request when dumps 
are involved being migrated there?

Clark Morris
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It 
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named 
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it 
to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and 
then destroy it

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
::DISCLAIMER::
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. 
The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore 
not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or 
opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and 
may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any 
form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written 
consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for 
viruses and other defects.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to