On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 21:41:57 +0200, Tomasz Rola wrote:
>> [...]
>> > Why not a plain ol' .zip?  The greater the variety of nested
>> > envelopes, the greater
>>
>> I think it is because *.zip is (almost) useless for spreading viruses.
>
>As an afterthought, I can see I should be more explicit... So, no I am
>not accusing. It is just after spending way too much time with
>computers I can see that we humans are, en masse, idiots. Therefor, if
>there is a file format helping with spreading malware, it will be
>choosen instead of one that helps inhibiting it.
>
Gresham's Law?

Not quite.  Humans, en masse, are apt to prefer the idiosyncratic utility
with a perceived added value such as a GUI.  Or, alas, too often automatically
opening/launching the extracted object, possibly malware.

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to