No, all 3278s had lower-case.

On 2018-11-19 15:46, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> I don't recall having APL support on our dual case 3277 displays. Could you 
> be thinking of 3278?
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http:%2F%2Fmason.gmu.edu%2F~smetz3&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca4bb1472490445b14a1508d64e602982%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636782572256498396&sdata=0oYifUvjw1tsPgFCfMM04XX8E%2BC0pMUdb2tjRUrYzgk%3D&reserved=0
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
> David Spiegel <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 2:52 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: So much for THAT excuse | Computerworld SHARK TANK
>
> If they had APL support, yes. Otherwise, no.
>
> On 2018-11-19 13:59, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> We had lower case on *our* 3277 displays. YMMV.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
>> https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsecure-web.cisco.com%2F1-pU3AdDexvRj4OY3cgAoX7du7k-ePI-SOg3QxOWhmiQ8cpyonow3rm2-DCrYLcF31L4S1UxZjSEm8S9RvvU4Hb9DtZUxuNE07pmonb-gUW688BRDVkUf4ugb9caY5V4rlqrkMUAZFOF0b3eM_kYuni8mnpPKDNFyM7FFZYD5R1dmpatj07ltpc8qJuNHcYEQ8-DriZZqfh30RpBiNGdkRq7ibJFaSrM2GYFD4-Ql-cU83jKl9Qd1IXuqSMPPCCb5Wgua1wKHzacuiXs_6YWvh-eAfvRl-xRlcYcVedL7i0xknQwXjJDgxKf6fbUQipJ1zjBu2_3ndmM7X884s3r--_aCBGSt3LyQv5uw0AA1QFhHey_G1KicZpqiqzG6JSqFkShizZXmL3N2vXs44HxB84G8C8AMYkRQ-c04Yt1nmEwlEguSdXEonztB5U0AEAgirIvbFueUm6MgDLuMz0y9Iw%2Fhttps%253A%252F%252Fnam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%252F%253Furl%253Dhttp%253A%25252F%25252Fmason.gmu.edu%25252F%257Esmetz3%2526data%253D02%25257C01%25257C%25257C375db7f755534b60f20208d64e512e6b%25257C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%25257C1%25257C0%25257C636782507931856827%2526sdata%253DQN7yQDXW%25252FC3TMRJxzUe4hN3QL8aYaar2pcfO%25252FgeKtx4%25253D%2526reserved%253D0&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca4bb1472490445b14a1508d64e602982%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636782572256498396&amp;sdata=y2D4zoPccOLcREgdKpWGxOmHWSfbcFqNqcYyVX3vBYo%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of 
>> David Spiegel <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 1:48 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: So much for THAT excuse | Computerworld SHARK TANK
>>
>> Chuck: 3277?
>>
>> On 2018-11-19 13:32, Chuck Kreiter wrote:
>>> First OS/390 install I did kept failing on the Unix System Services steps.
>>> The terminal I had only did uppercase.  Once I swapped it out with one that
>>> did both cases, it worked fine.  Beat my head on the desk for a couple of
>>> days on that one.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
>>> Behalf Of Phil Smith III
>>> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 1:13 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: So much for THAT excuse | Computerworld SHARK TANK
>>>
>>> Nice.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I once got on a plane to go to a customer site because they could NOT get an
>>> SNMP common string accepted. As I had at least half suspected, they were
>>> entering it in uppercase, despite multiple explicit attempts to get them to
>>> enter it in lowercase. (Yes, I'd suggested WebEx or equivalent; "Not
>>> allowed".)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Customer wasn't even abashed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Case sensitivity and null-terminated strings: two historical Unix mistakes
>>> that have cost untold billions.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
>>> to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>> .
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> .
>>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> .
>



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to