No, the expectation was that the application would know the correct code page through some other channel. I suppose that you could do an UNPK and see what the zones were on the left side, but I don't know of any plans to do that.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Pew, Curtis G <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:39 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: So much for THAT excuse | Computerworld SHARK TANK On Nov 19, 2018, at 4:26 PM, Steve Thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > S/360 machines I worked on had a switch in the PSW to set them in ASCII mode. > I don’t remember or know of any software that made use of this. So that bit > was eventually required to be ON to force DAT or XA. I have forgotten what > that bit was “stolen” for now. > Right. The expectation was that routines would check the bit and generate output in the appropriate codeset, and eventually everyone would be using ASCII. Instead, everyone ignored the bit and generated EBCDIC, so the bit was reused for something else (I can’t remember what either.) -- Pew, Curtis G [email protected] ITS Systems/Core/Administrative Services ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
