On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 21:46:57 -0600, Bruce Schaefer wrote: >I agree; we don't know how well JES2 and PDSE play together. If IBM rejects >the RFE because PDSE solves the issue, we will likely initiate plans to >convert the problem dataset to PDSE. Regardless, I believe IBM should update >JES2 to include the JES3 function provided by //*MAIN UPDATE= > If PDSE solves the issue, what reason do they have to update JES3?
I'd prefer to see greater compatibility between PDSE and UNIX directories: PDSE in $PATH and UNIX directories in PROCLIB, SYSEXEC, STEPLIB, ... -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
