We are at AIM stage 3 so don’t need the UNIXMAP CLASS active. Also we do have VLF active with the usual IRR* entries.
Oddly enough it takes a good 10 seconds for ISHELL to start as well. We do not see these delays on any other LPAR. On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:03 AM Tom Conley <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/19/2019 6:51 AM, Michael Babcock wrote: > > Does anyone else see this behavior or could help me determine what’s > wrong? > > When using ISPF 3.4 and putting in a directory (doesn’t matter which > one) > > it can take up to 10 seconds to display. When typing 3.17 on the > command > > line and hitting enter it takes up to 10 seconds for the ISPF screen to > > display. > > > > This only happens on our dev system. Our prod and sandbox don’t display > > this behavior > > > > We are at z/OS 2.3 with a fairly recent RSU level. > > > > Hey Mike, > > If you're trying to display large directories, 3.17 will not perform as > well as ISHELL because it's an ISPF table display and not a dynamic > area. If you need the performance, you still have to use ISHELL. > > Regards, > Tom Conley > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Michael Babcock OneMain Financial z/OS Systems Programmer, Lead ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
