On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:21:40 +0000, Martin Packer wrote: >ON INREC, if you used IFTHEN WHEN=INIT you could prime with a timestamp >and then with a subsequent IFTHEN overwrite the last few bytes of the >timestamp with an incrementing value. > But what if the OP requires an actual timestamp rather than merely an incrementing value?
>Kind of like a pipeline. Though, when I explained what he'd built to Frank >Yaeger he didn't respond as a plumber would. :-) >From: Bill Ashton >Date: 28/03/2019 12:32 > >Kolusu, I would like one little tweak, if you please - is it possible to >get the timestamp fresh on each record, instead of using the same >timestamp >value for all of them? --gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
