On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:02 PM Cieri, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote:
> > This won't help unless you are running IBM System Automation (SA). > I believe that IBM SA can be configured to "trap" messages written to > JESSYSMSG. > Thanks. We don't run that. We run CA-OPS/MVS. We are heavy into CA products. > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of John McKown > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 9:24 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: "Trapping" messages written to JESYSMSG? > > This question was sparked by the thread on tracking PROC usage. I don't see > any way to "trap" messages written to JESYSMSG. I know that I can process > them using the SAPI, > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieaf200/sapi.htm > , > or the SDSF API or a number of other methods. But they are more "after the > fact" rather than "in line" (as the messages are issued). > > Any ideas how this might be done? I wish that there were a JES exit for > this. But I don't see one. > -- This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough hunchbacks. Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
