> It is obvious that IBM has vulnerabilities in z/OS.

Water is wet; I've reported one such. But not all vulnerabilities are trap 
doors.

Do you know of a trap door installed by IBM?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Lou 
Losee <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 11:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Fwd: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls

Just because it has not been brought up and I think it is pertinent to this
discussion.

It is obvious that IBM has vulnerabilities in z/OS.  The existence of the
integrity APARs are proof of that.  There may not be as many as the fixes
released for Windows or Mac, but they do exist.

Lou
--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
  - Unknown


On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:33 AM Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've never seen a trap door installed by IBM. What I've seen was trap
> doors installed by data center staff and trap doors in 3rd party software.
> In those cases it's not the platform that is insecure but the installation.
> Would you blame the lock if someone leaves their key under the doormat?
>
> d) You know how to fix the trap door but management won't let you.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf
> of R.S. <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 7:01 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Just how secure are mainframes? | Trevor Eddolls
>
> As Shmuel said an application with a trap door is an application
> vulnerability.
> Ideed, IF you know such trap door, you know z/OS vulnerability, which
> proves the platform is not immune. Is it as vulnerable as Windows? No,
> because it's still not binary, some systems are still more secure than
> others.
>
> Last, but not least:  assuming you know such trap door. Or even several
> trap doors. What next?
> a) you submitted it to IBM and they are trying to fix it.
> b) despite of a) you know how to fix it by homegrown
> code/configuration/procedure and you offer it as a service.
> c) the trap door cannot be fixed and then your services are disputable -
> you cannot help.
>
> Of course the above *regards only the trap doors you know*, not your
> services portfolio.
> Besides that you can provide many valuable services regarding security,
> but not platform issues, rather people mistakes, misconfigurations,
> erroneous procedures, etc.
> It is worth to emphasize: while z/OS is quite secure, it may be quite
> complex to configure it properly. And here there is a field for Ray,
> ITschak, RSM Partners, me, etc.
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
>
> W dniu 2019-05-29 o 17:11, Ray Overby pisze:
> > In response to "Mistakes, lack of time, lack of control, lack of
> > skills. Not a platform weakness." comment: The mainframe platform,
> > z/OS, and ESM's all rely on integrity to function. A single TRAP DOOR
> > code vulnerability pierces the veil of integrity and can be used to
> > compromise the mainframe. Is this a platform weakness? I think so. The
> > platform relies on all code it runs adhering to certain rules. z/OS
> > could be changed to better check and enforce those rules.
> >
> > Would you say that the elimination of User Key Common storage is an
> > example of a z/OS change to address a mainframe platform weakness? I
> > think so.
> >
> > An interesting observation. Thanks.
> >
> > On 5/29/2019 5:25 AM, R.S. wrote:
> >> That's classical FUD.
> >> Frightening people.
> >> "if an exploit", "if job reads you RACF db", "unintended consequences".
> >> What exactly hacking scenario can provide RACF db to the hacker?
> >> Yes, I saw APF libraries with UACC(ALTER), UID(0) as standard TSO
> >> user attribute, even UPDATE to RACF db. But it's problem of people.
> >> Mistakes, lack of time, lack of control, lack of skills. Not a
> >> platform weakness.
> >>
> >> It's typical that assurance/lock/gun salesmen tend to talk about
> >> risks, threats and dangers. They create a vision.
> >> My English is poor, but I can observe it for two of debaters here.
> >> It's visible. I don't like social engineering.
>
> ======================================================================
>
> Jeśli nie jesteś adresatem tej wiadomości:
>
> - powiadom nas o tym w mailu zwrotnym (dziękujemy!),
> - usuń trwale tę wiadomość (i wszystkie kopie, które wydrukowałeś lub
> zapisałeś na dysku).
> Wiadomość ta może zawierać chronione prawem informacje, które może
> wykorzystać tylko adresat.Przypominamy, że każdy, kto rozpowszechnia
> (kopiuje, rozprowadza) tę wiadomość lub podejmuje podobne działania,
> narusza prawo i może podlegać karze.
>
> mBank S.A. z siedzibą w Warszawie, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950 Warszawa,
> http://secure-web.cisco.com/14ILHCRRunYvlSTtGew3dxkMnoq-EQXunQmxen_zjQXxLP_IX-Ug58lArQAAiDC5ACZe4lMf0-jck0ghav2cqfF_LnMQM_LW30FcxGv_RtgvQgLZhcGgFKSX0F8zBNsaREU7crKD5N9qMEep08A3gQGMJb3xeCyGFXo40ow3C4kklzJKo8ceb3j4dNkhTHXRroJVJvFgw8OmxGSZLh5Cd0s4plzQ0KQOs4Xy6uxx3qpKYcs3SBxUf0fBQo3DcK2kSBE4k3ScihhcNjTJwUDXdyrULocL9bMwXrAVups_q5FzLwrUN5zsycmBegw6QssGwOBAEpAD4PJuMl7bPaecJqL_m4uu_J6gwb2aG9F4h4wvt2z8H95YdG86TQJTbDpHc/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mBank.pl,
> e-mail: [email protected]. Sąd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydział
> Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS 0000025237, NIP:
> 526-021-50-88. Kapitał zakładowy (opłacony w całości) według stanu na
> 01.01.2018 r. wynosi 169.248.488 złotych.
>
> If you are not the addressee of this message:
>
> - let us know by replying to this e-mail (thank you!),
> - delete this message permanently (including all the copies which you have
> printed out or saved).
> This message may contain legally protected information, which may be used
> exclusively by the addressee.Please be reminded that anyone who
> disseminates (copies, distributes) this message or takes any similar
> action, violates the law and may be penalised.
>
> mBank S.A. with its registered office in Warsaw, ul. Senatorska 18, 00-950
> Warszawa,
> http://secure-web.cisco.com/14ILHCRRunYvlSTtGew3dxkMnoq-EQXunQmxen_zjQXxLP_IX-Ug58lArQAAiDC5ACZe4lMf0-jck0ghav2cqfF_LnMQM_LW30FcxGv_RtgvQgLZhcGgFKSX0F8zBNsaREU7crKD5N9qMEep08A3gQGMJb3xeCyGFXo40ow3C4kklzJKo8ceb3j4dNkhTHXRroJVJvFgw8OmxGSZLh5Cd0s4plzQ0KQOs4Xy6uxx3qpKYcs3SBxUf0fBQo3DcK2kSBE4k3ScihhcNjTJwUDXdyrULocL9bMwXrAVups_q5FzLwrUN5zsycmBegw6QssGwOBAEpAD4PJuMl7bPaecJqL_m4uu_J6gwb2aG9F4h4wvt2z8H95YdG86TQJTbDpHc/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mBank.pl,
> e-mail: [email protected]. District Court for the Capital City of Warsaw,
> 12th Commercial Division of the National Court Register, KRS 0000025237,
> NIP: 526-021-50-88. Fully paid-up share capital amounting to PLN
> 169,248,488 as at 1 January 2018.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to