I guess I still don’t understand all the hubbub.... If you aren’t applying
maintenance to running system, then "fixing" sys1.miglib on another volume is a
piece of cake, and does NOT involve any LLA unallocate commands etc....
When I go to rename SYS1.MIGLIB on my maintenance SYSRES RSM02A, I get:
IEC614I RENAME FAILED - RC 008, DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION IS (040B0446),
IKJACCNT,RSM02A,SYS1.MIGLIB
DATA SET NAME IS IN USE BUT YOU HAVE AUTHORITY TO OVERRIDE THIS TEST
And then I press enter...
Rename Data Set In Use
Command ===>
Data Set Name . : SYS1.MIGLIB
Volume . . . . : RSM02A
The system detected that a data set with the above name is in use
(possibly on another system) but it cannot determine whether it is the
data set you wish to rename. If it is the same data set and any program
has it open, renaming it could cause serious system and data integrity
problems.
You have the extra security authority to rename the data set even though
its name is in use. Refer to the DFSMS documentation on the RENAME macro
for further information.
Instructions:
Press ENTER to override data set name protection and rename the data
set.
Enter CANCEL or EXIT to cancel the rename request.
Am I missing something? As for size, no need to hog wild on freespace *if*
the only time it is an issue is applying to non-running sysres volume.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 11:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SYS1.MIGLIB and LNKLST
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
On 6/12/2019 9:06 AM, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> Just as an aside, the underlying issue is LPALIB, LINKLIB and MIGLIB
> are underallocated in the ServerPac dialog, I've opened a case with
> the serverpac folks years ago and alway "TRY" to remember to change
> the allocation of these libraries prior to them being allocated. the
> libraries are allocated with just enough space to install the OS from
> the ServerPac, no room for maint in most cases.
Not to hijack the thread, but... I thought ServerPac already automatically adds
20% (25?) free space, but I could be wrong. In any case, how much free space
should be allocated by ServerPac? I saw 50% mentioned. Is that enough?
Should it be the same for every data set, or just the three you mention? Is it
possible to get any kind of consensus on this topic?
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development Chuck Norris never uses CHECK when
he applies PTFs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN **CAUTION EXTERNAL
EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or unexpected
emails**
This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be
privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
