Can you please clarify? Your first sentence seems to say that SVC 99 (or do you mean Initiator) CPU time is in the SMF 30? Can you be more specific?
Your last sentence seems to say the opposite? Or ... ? Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Allan Staller Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 12:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CPU time cost of dynamic allocation This allocation time can be calculated from SMF type 30. I am sure time is tracked. I am not sure the associated CPU is tracked. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 11:45 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CPU time cost of dynamic allocation On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 12:25:05 -0400, Charles Mills wrote: > >OTOH I have an IEFBR14 batch job on the same machine that allocates 15 >temporary datasets in JCL. The entire job lock, stock and barrel uses >(according to IEF032I) .00 CPU seconds. Can anyone explain why JCL >allocation is apparently much more CPU efficient than SVC 99 allocation? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
