When did that change? It used to be that MLPA was subject to pageout.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> on behalf of Jim Mulder <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2019 12:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: LOADing a module into common storage Stores into unfixed static PLPA/MLPA are lost if a frame is stolen, because RSM recognizes the address ranges of static PLPA/MLPA and treats them differently. Dynamic LPA processing loads the modules into ordinary CSA storage. RSM knows nothing about Dynamic LPA, so stores into Dynamic LPA are not lost if the frame is stolen. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY > It's not so much the storing that's the problem; I understood that an LPA > module that's marked REFR (and maybe just RENT) doesn't need to be paged > out, and so my store might be silently lost. Probably I have this wrong, > that is, if the change bit is on in a page it *will* be paged out if the > frame is needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
